NIST Polymers Division Banner NIST Polymers Division Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory National Institutes of Standards and technology
NIST polymers logo Side bar NIST Polymers characterization group logo NIST Polymers electronics group logo NIST Polymers biomaterials group logo NIST Polymers Multiphase group logo NIST Polymers processing group logo NIST Polymers combi group logo Side bar
 Our Publication:
 Group:

 Year:


 
 
button  HOME
button  Structure-Property Relationships in Dental Polymers and Composites
     button  Nanocomposite Dental Materials
  button  Structure-Property Relationships of Hydrogels for Dental and Craniofacial Applications
  button  The Effect of an Organogelator on Bioactive Dental Composites
  button   High-throughput and combinatorial methods for measuring the mechanical properties of dental materials
button  Combinatorial Methods for Rapid Screening of Biomaterials
  button  High-throughput Method for Determining Young’s Modulus of Polymer Blends
  button  Inflammatory Cytokine Quantification of Cell-SCK Interactions via RT-PCR
  button  Peptide Derivatized SCK Nanoparticles
  button  Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  button  Gradient Library Screening of Cell-Material Interactions
  button  Surface Energy Gradients for Characterizing Cell-Material Interactions
  button  High-throughput Method for Characterizing Cell Response to Polymer Crystallinity
  button   Cellular Response to Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Vinyl Conversion Gradients
button  Metrologies for Tissue Scaffolds
  button  Focal Adhesions of Osteoblasts on Poly(d,l-lactide)/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Blends by Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
  button   2D -->3D Cell / Scaffold Interactions
  button  Development of a Reference Scaffold
  button   In Vitro Cartilage Development
  button   Gene Expression Profiles of Cells in Response to Tyrosine Polycarbonate Blends
  button Broadband Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) Microscopic Imaging
  button Collinear Optical Coherence and Confocal Fluorescence Microscopies
 

line
 
 
 

Cellular Response to Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Vinyl Conversion Gradients

 

Introduction

line
 
Composite materials for dental restorations do not attain complete vinyl conversion after curing. To study the cellular response to incomplete conversion, techniques were developed to fabricate dental resins with varying conversion levels. In our initial studies, common resin monomers, 2,2-bis[4-(2’-hydroxy-3’-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl]propane (Bis-GMA) and tri(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), were used. The cellular response to the gradients was evaluated using macrophages, a significant cell type in inflammation. Cell viability as a function of resin conversion level was investigated using fluorescence microscopy.

Experimental Approach

line
 

Resins of Bis-GMA and TEGDMA (1.8:1.0 mass ratio) with a camphorquinone-based photoinitiator system were cured (60 s per side) in a Teflon mold (55 mm x 12 mm x 1.5 mm) between two glass slides using a visible light curing unit.

 

For centered, overlaid fabrication, samples were centered on the sample stage and overlaid with a mask. For off-centered fabrication, samples were placed off-centered on the stage.

 

Masks to create centered, overlaid conversion gradients were printed on transparency film using a laser printer.

Using near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, conversion was calculated as the reduction in =C–H absorption (6164 cm-1) normalized to the aromatic absorption (4623 cm-1).

Resins were sterilized in 70 % volume fraction ethanol, pre-incubated in growth medium for 24 h, and seeded with 5 x 105 Raw 264.7 macrophages. Control cells were seeded on tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS). After incubating at 37 °C for 24 h, cells were incubated for 5 min with 2 µmol/L ethidium homodimer-1 and 2 µmol/L calcein AM in phosphate buffered saline and imaged using fluorescence microscopy.

 

 

Conversion Gradients and Corresponding Cellular Response

line
 

NIR spectroscopy (above) confirmed the presence of conversion gradients for both fabrication methods (below). Error bars represent one standard deviation and are the estimate of standard uncertainty. The higher standard deviations in the centered, overlaid group are likely due to printer inconsistencies.

The centered, overlaid technique combined the light source and mask to create resins with the highest conversion in the center. In the off-centered technique, the sample edge was aligned with the center of the stage to result in the highest conversion at that edge and the lowest conversion at the opposite edge. Additional conversion profiles can be produced by adjusting the mask design, cure time, or sample placement.

Preliminary cell studies revealed that macrophage spreading was reduced on the resin, especially at lower conversion levels. Cells on a resin fabricated using the centered, overlaid technique were found to have the highest viability in the center, where the highest vinyl conversion was located (above). Viable cells appeared green, and cells with compromised cell membranes fluoresced red.

Studies to quantify the inflammatory response as a function of resin conversion level are ongoing.

The following funding is gratefully acknowledged: NIST/NIDCR Interagency Agreement (Y1-DE-1021-04), NRC Postdoctoral Research Associateship to N.J.L.

 

 

NIST Contributors:

line
 
Nancy J. Lin
LeeAnn O. Bailey
 

Collaborators:

line
 
Newell R. Washburn
(Carnegie Mellon University)

 
 
 
 
 
line
NIST logo
Biomaterials Group
Polymers Division
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory

 
NIST Polymers logo