Polymers
Division
|
|
|
NIST
Combinatorial Methods Center Focused Project
|
|
|
|
High Throughput Methods for the Evaluation of Adhesive Performance |
| The NIST
Combinatorial Methods Center is pleased to announce initiation of a
two year focused project to develop an integrated measurement approach
for adhesives properties characterization.
The focus project will adapt existing MCAT (Multi-lens Combinatorial
Adhesion Test), peel and wedge test methods to measure adhesion
properties as a function of important process variables characterizing
pressure sensitive adhesives and thermally curing epoxies. We are
inviting NCMC member organizations and others to join the project.
The members of the focused project will help the NCMC select model
systems, prioritize the characterization required and specify
processing variables of interest. Research results will be available
to focused project members throughout the project period and member
organizations will be able to participate directly with NIST
researchers in development of the measurement systems. |
|
| Statement
of Work |
|
High-throughput MCAT, peel and wedge
methods will be developed to measure bulk and surface properties of
model adhesives formulations, specifically pressure sensitive
adhesives (PSA) and thermal curing epoxy resin systems. In PSA’s we
will characterize composition, relative tack and plasticizer content,
blend morphology and crystallinity. In epoxy systems, the composition
and thermal rate of curing will be mapped. Measurables include PSA
adhesion against gradient surface energy and rough surfaces, and epoxy
adhesion strength against silica (SiO2) and polyimide (PI)
material surfaces. Characterization methods include microscopy,
florescence and IR imaging. Measurements will be performed as a
function of important process parameters that include sample gradient
temperature and temperature cycling, sample aging and sample quench
conditions. |
| |
| Contact:
Christopher Stafford |
|
Phone: (301) 975-4368 |
|
E-mail:
chris.stafford@nist.gov
|
|
| Introduction:
|
|
A wide variety of PSA’s and
epoxy resins are used in industrial and commercial applications. PSA
performance is strongly dependent on the nature of the adhesive base,
key formulation components, environmental parameters, substrate
parameters and other specific factors. Likewise, a thermally curing
epoxy resins’s performance is affected by composition (epoxy resin:
curing agent), pre and post curing temperature and rate, substrate
surface characteristics, and other specific factors. This makes the
development of a high throughput approach for the evaluation of PSA's
and epoxies a challenging task. This project is directed towards
developing a testing framework that can be used to evaluate adhesive
and epoxy resin performance as a function of key manufacturing and
environmental variables. This focused project aims to develop a
high-throughput test method that will quickly characterize and
evaluate adhesive and epoxy resin performance, correlate performance
to measured adhesive and epoxy characteristics and provide sufficient
experimental information to facilitate selective in-depth study of
these systems. |
| |
|
Background:
|
| Peel and
tack tests are often used to measure the performance of an adhesive.
The former is a more industrially relevant qualitative measure of
pressure sensitive adhesive performance [1] and the latter has
recently emerged as a potential method to better characterize and
visualize the mechanisms occurring during the debonding of a soft
adhesive layer from either a flat or spherical probe [2,3]. Each test
represents a slightly different approach. The peel test is a
qualitative method that measures the maximum force required to
separate an adhesive strip from a substrate. It allows one to quickly
compare the performance between different adhesives and is a valuable
tool for industrial testing. Tack tests not only measure the force
exerted by the adhesive on the probe during debonding, but also the
adhesive-probe contact area and the displacement required to
completely separate the probe from the adhesive. A semi-quantitative
test that quickly determines relative or absolute adhesive
performance, but also permits further investigation of adhesive
debonding mechanisms would be a unique and powerful tool for adhesive
investigations. Wedge tests are useful to probe interfacial debonding
at glassy interfaces (e.g. the fully cured epoxy interface). A sharp
wedge such as a razor blade is driven into the interface at a known
velocity and the crack propagation front is imaged to determine the
work of adhesion and interfacial energy, given the modulus of the two
materials is known. |
| |
|
Combinatorial methods utilize high-throughput measurement techniques
to investigate a multi-variant parameter space more efficiently. The
NIST combinatorial methods center (NCMC) has been actively developing
combinatorial approaches to probe polymer adhesion. One such approach
builds on the contact mechanics proposed by Johnson, Kendall, and
Roberts (JKR), where the adhesion of a spherical indenter to a
substrate is ascertained by following the contact area of the indenter
during a loading and unloading cycle. The multi-lens combinatorial
adhesion test (MCAT) is a high-throughput adhesion test bed currently
under development at the NCMC. This high-throughput adhesion test
employs an array of hemispherical lenses attached to a vertical
actuator to perform from several hundred to several thousand probe
tack tests at one time; see Figure 1. When these lenses are brought
into contact with a gradient library, adhesion is measured over a
large parameter space. The MCAT geometry is extremely flexible,
allowing investigation of several different types of materials. The
lens array may be fabricated from a material as rigid as glass, fully
or partially cured epoxy or even an elastomer such as
polydimethylsiloxane. The surface of the array may be chemically
modified with a monolayer or coated with a thin film of polymer [4].
The MCAT measurable variables from each lens include the lens
displacement (d),
the contact area (a). Potentially the load (P) applied to each
lens, within the lens array, is measurable, although not in the
present MCAT set-up. To first order, from this information, relevant
measures of adhesive performance can be evaluated knowing the maximum
load (Pmax) achieved during unloading, and the total
displacement (dtotal)
to detach each lens on the array from the adhesive. The freedom to
change MCAT geometry ensures the applicability of this technique to a
large number of adhesive-substrate systems. |
| |
|
The current MCAT
geometry is well suited for the measurement of adhesive forces across
partial to fully cured epoxy resins, but is unsuited for investigation
of soft materials such as PSA’s and uncured epoxy films. In order to
better understand the debonding process for the soft materials, the
current lens array will require modification from an array of
hemispherical lenses to an array of posts. The post array ensures
constant contact area between the probe and adhesive layer, which
simplifies the stress-strain analysis required to quantify the
debonding process. The array of posts may be created using developed
soft lithography techniques and modified using techniques perfected on
the current hemispherical lens arrays in use with the MCAT technique. |
| |
| Technical
Approach: |
|
This focused
project will allow integration of MCAT for comparative adhesion
tests on model non-proprietary adhesive and epoxy systems
(prioritized by the participating members) involving important
variables associated with library characterization and mapping
intrinsic physical and chemical characteristics. High-throughput
adaptations to traditional peel, tack and wedge tests will provide
results for cross-checking against standard industrial adhesion test
methods, while MCAT will exist as a platform for quickly evaluating
adhesive performance and semi-quantitatively investigating debonding
process. At this point, the project encompasses four differing, but
parallel thrusts using 1 to 2 selected model adhesive and epoxy
systems in consultation with focused project members:
|
| |
|
1. Establish techniques
for library generation of identified parameters
Currently the NCMC has a suite of
techniques available to create gradient libraries. We will develop
and adapt gradient methods for MCAT, peel and wedge tests, as
appropriate, using select model PSA and epoxy systems in consultation
with the focused project members. This includes creating the post
array that will be used in subsequent experiments. In MCAT we expect
Pmax and
dtotal
to change as a function of adhesive variables – film thickness,
composition, crystallinity, plasticizer, tackifier, copolymers and
other formulation components. Therefore, the ability to create and
test gradients of these variables is important to the performance of
PSA and likely the adhesive and viscoelastic behavior of curing
epoxies (under slowly curing or quenched conditions). |
| |
2. Characterize
libraries and map properties of interest
Properties of interest in the model
PSA include tack, bulk vs. surface composition, morphology and
viscoelasticity, while the rate and degree of cure,
interfacial-bonding strength, and cured physical property values are
important for epoxy systems. These properties will be measured as a
function of temperature under different conditions (constant,
gradient, cycling, quench). Surface and bulk compositions of libraries
will be mapped by IR microscopy (and SIMS, if needed). MCAT arrays
would probe a unique combination (e.g. tackifier/temperature) allowing
for development of a semi-quantitative comparative adhesion map across
a library. Film morphology is imaged during debonding, with MCAT at
each debonding location during the study. Similar to the peel test,
the maximum load achieved during unloading is indicative of adhesive
performance [5], but additional useful information is obtained from
the entire tack curve as shown in Figure 2. In this regard, the MCAT
combinatorial approach out performs traditional measurement techniques
by affording better control of the loading/unloading cycle. The
ability to measure load does not currently exist for MCAT and tests
are required to determine its feasibility. Consequently, using load
sensor arrays to map load for an individual or a local set of
microlenses is a goal for MCAT (see Figure 2). Finally, library design
and measurements will be integrated using the NCMC informatics system. |
|
|
3. Correlate properties
with parameters to develop understanding of cause-effect
relationships
The third thrust correlates
cause-effect relationships between PSA parameters such as film
thickness, composition, crystallinity, tackifier, copolymer and
additives and applied temperature, time, quench and aging to the
measured tack and viscoelastic properties. Likewise, the relationship
between composition of epoxy, curing temperature and time, filler (if
any) and interfacial adhesion energy will be developed. These require
physical insight into mechanisms involved during the debonding process
to understand cause-effect relationships. For instance, in MCAT, the
contact area between individual lenses and the adhesive film is imaged
throughout the debonding process. The onset of fingering
instabilities, cavitation, geometry of the instability, and the area
in contact with each lens of the array during debonding will provide
details relative to the viscoelastic behavior of the adhesive and
adhesive performance. Varying the lens velocity during contact and
retraction and correlating load changes with the onset of fingering or
cavitation instabilities may provide insights into the viscoelastic
nature of the adhesive. |
|
|
4. Calibration against
standard test methods
We envision working jointly with the
focused project members to have measurements on identical or similar
library samples conducted in their industrial laboratory settings in
order to cross-calibrate the high-throughput MCAT, peel and wedge-test
against traditional and industrial test methods. |
| |
| References:
|
|
1. Satas D. Handbook of
pressure-sensitive adhesive technology, Van Nostrand Reinhold,
New York, 1982.
2. Creton C.; Fabre P.
TACK Comprehensive Adhesion Science, (II) 2002.
3. Shull K. R.; Ahn D.; Chen
W. L.; Flanigan C. M.; Crosby A. J. Axisymmetric adhesion tests
of soft materials,
Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics (199) 1998, 489-511.
4. Crosby A. J.; Karim A.;
Amis E. J. Combinatorial investigations of interfacial failure,
Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics (41) 2003,
883-891.
5. Chuang HK; Chiu C.;
Paniagua R. Avery Adhesive Test yields more performance data than
traditional probe,
Adhesives Age (10) 1997, 18-23.
|
|
| Preliminary
Results:
|
|

|
| |
| Figure 1: A schematic of the
MCAT test bed, current geometry. The adhesion across the sample
film is measured at many points with the lens array. The contact
area is visualized through the sample film with an inverted
microscope. |
| |
|
|
| |
| Figure 2: A sample film on a
flat substrate whose composition (φ) is varied
orthogonal to the applied temperature (T) gradient. Below the
film is a schematic of proposed force sensor arrays to measure P(δ)
"locally" as function of (T,φ). Right hand plot shows the type
of quantative information that could be obtained with this enhanced
capability, and correlated with optical image sequence at each δ. |
| |
|
|
| |
| Figure 3: Schematic approach
to PSA adhesion and Epoxy curing for high-throughput characterization
and properties measurements. |
|
| Project
Meetings, Website, Reports and Lab visits:
|
|
A discussion meeting will be arranged
six weeks after the formal launch of the project as well as at
six-month intervals for the duration of the project. NCMC will
facilitate dissemination and communication among members of the focus
project. Quarterly reports will be sent to the members, with updates
more frequently via conference calls. In order to facilitate the
collaboration, specifications for methods, instruments, programs, data
analysis, and other aspects of this work will be available to members
during the course of the project. A summary report will be provided
within two months of the end of the project. The NCMC labs will be
open to prearranged visits from member scientists interested in
hands-on participation in method development. |
|
|
|
As with base level membership in the NCMC, all of the research carried
out in the Focused Project is non-proprietary and is intended for
publication in the public domain. No proprietary information or
materials will be solicited or accepted by NIST from member
organizations. The scope of the work by NIST included in this focused
project is limited as described in Appendix A of the focused project
agreement. |
|
|
Project Milestones:
|
|
First year |
|
§ Select
suitable model adhesive-tackifier blend and an epoxy system and
establish techniques for library generation of identified
parameters.
§
Conduct preliminary tests on at least one selected model PSA and one
selected epoxy system.
|
|
|
Second year |
|
§
Develop a systematic
process for library generation, characterization and testing of
adhesive and epoxy films and integration with the (NCMC) informatics
database.
§
Correlate properties
with parameters to develop understanding of cause-effect
relationships for the model PSA and epoxy system (s) studied and
draft summary report on each.
§
Assist focused project members investigation of a suitable
non-proprietary commercial blend system to determine cause-effect
relationships between parameters and performance and provide
feedback for optimization. |
|
| Membership
Fee:
|
| The membership fee payable to NIST is $ 20,000
per project year. |
| Send
a completed Project Agreement Form and fee to:
|
|
|
NIST
Attn: Administrative Officer, Polymers Division
100 Bureau Drive
Mailstop 8540
Gaithersburg, MD USA
20899
|
|
| The
project is scheduled to begin on September 1, 2003.
NIST reserves the right to cancel the focused project and
refund the membership fees in the case of insufficient member
participation.
|
|
| NIST Materials Science & Engineering Laboratory
- Polymers Division |
|
|
|
|

|
|
| Contact Information: |
| Cher H. Davis |
| Technical Coordinator |
| combi@nist.gov
|
| (301) 975 6488 |
|
|

|
|