Material Summary: The composition
of SRM 2910 slightly deviates from the theoretical compositional formula
for calcium hydroxylapatite Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. The compositional formula
of SRM 2910, obtained from chemical analyses and charge balance, normalized
to 6 phosphate groups (PO4 + HPO4) per formula unit, is:
Ca9.985(HPO4)0.063(PO4)5.937
(OH)2.026(CO3)0.005(SiO3)0.005
+ 0.902 H2O. SRM 2910 is a high-purity powder form of calcium hydroxylapatite
with crystal sizes of about 0.1 µm to 0.5 µm. This SRM
is certified for calcium and phosphorus contents, Ca/P molar ratio,
specific surface area, and solubility product.
Material heterogeneity was assessed for each of the certified analytes
or physical parameters by means of analysis of variance (ANOVA)
[1]. Uncertainties were assessed by use of the CIPM approach [2].
The certified and reference values are expressed as mean value ±
expanded uncertainty (U) [3].
Source of Material: The
calcium Hydroxylapatite was synthesized at NIST by solution reaction
of calcium oxide and phosphoric acid in accordance with the procedure
of McDowell et al. [5]. The calcium Hydroxylapatite precipitate, approximately
900 g, was dried at 105 °C in air for 1 day. The resulting calcium
Hydroxylapatite [6,7] is composed of about 75 % (by mass) of the hexagonal
form (space groups P63/m or specifically P63 [8]) and of about 25
% (by mass) of the monoclinic form (space group P21/b [9]).
Property Table
The values presented here are derived for SRM 2910, high purity powder
form of calcium hydroxylapatite powder with crystal sizes of about
0.1 µm to 0.5 µm. Estimated combined relative expanded
uncertainties, Ur , of the property values, are listed in column 3.
For example, a value of 3.0 with Ur = 5 % is equivalent to 3.0 +/-
0.15. A question mark, (?), for Ur means the uncertainty could not
be determined with the available data. For complete conditions of
evaluation and definitions of thermodynamic terms go to: https://srmors.nist.gov/certificates/2910.pdf?CFID=111836&CFTOKEN=d456d0f5e7732bda-E81E8C50-A5AA-7E42-0279289888B3006A&jsessionid=b4301698541090521042000
Property [unit]
Ur
a
Number of measurements/comments
Reference
Calcium Content(mass fraction)
39.15 %
0.01 %
20 replicates
10
Phosphorous Content (mass fraction)
18.18 %
0.04 %
20 replicates
10, 11
Ca/P Molar Ratio
1.664
0.005 %
Based on the determinations of Calcium and Phosphorous mass fractions
Special Notes on Properties: Heating Conditions Causing Partial
Dehydroxylation of Hydroxylapatite
Drafted by Bruce Fowler and John Tesk
At temperatures above 900 °C in air, partial dehydroxylation
of Hydroxylapatite (HA), Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2,
to oxyhydroxylapatite (OHA), Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2-xO0.5x,
can occur. This is based on x-ray diffraction [28,29,30,31], gravimetric
[32], and infrared data [31,33] that either indicates or is consistent
with the premise that HA begins to lose hydroxide ions on heating
in air in the 900 °C to 1000 °C range.
To easily identify dehydroxylation in HA, an infrared band at 434
cm-1 in the spectra of heated HA can be utilized. This 434 cm-1
band has been assigned to Ca3++O= stretching
[34]; it results from thermal dehydroxylation of HA to form oxide
and water ( OH- + OH- --> O= +
H2O) and is specific for OHA. This band is recommended
for use to identify OHA that has been formed in HA that has been
heated.
Moreover, two of the above-cited articles display infrared spectra
of HA heated in air. At 900 °C, the 434 cm-1 band was not observed
but was observed for heating at 1050°C [31] and at 1000 °C
[33].
Partial dehydroxylation of HA after heating at 1000 °C in air
has also been reported in a publication on preparation of a HA reference
material [35]. Partial dehydroxylation has also been observed in
NIST SRM® 2910 HA heated at 1000 °C in air at
50 % relative humidity based on the presence of the 434 cm-1 band
[36]; reheating this partially dehydroxylated SRM®2910
at 850°C in air at 50 % relative humidity resulted in rehydroxylation
and concomitant loss of the 434 cm-1 band [36].
Consequently, when preparing HA for laboratory use, reduction of
the preparation temperature from 1000 °C to 850 °C in air
is strongly recommended to avoid partial dehydroxylation of the
HA (850 °C is recommended rather than 900 °C to ensure the
absence of dehydroxylation).
The heating treatments for preparation of HA are usually carried
out in air at normal humidity, which is usually a relative humidity
of about 30 % to 50 %. Because dehydroxylation of HA is water vapor
pressure dependent, the dehydroxylation temperature will decrease
at low humidity. About 20 % dehydroxylation occurred for HA heated
in vacuum at pressure of 6.7 Pa (0.05 Torr) at 800 °C for 20
h and then cooling under the same pressure to 25 °C [34]; hence,
there is the need to also ensure that there is relative humidity
above about 30 %. Reference 34 has a Fig. 5 that shows the 434 cm-1
band as being absent in "pure" HA vs. the situation in
which there is a presence of OHA. Reference 34 also gives additional
data including shift and intensity changes of the 434 cm-1 band
and of a relevant band of OHA with increasing dehydroxylation.
Put a space here
Fig 6 in reference 31 and Fig. 11 in reference 33 show conditions
under which the 434 cm-1 band has been produced, demonstrating the
presence of OHA.
Fig 7 from Reference 36 has data which further supports the comments
given.
Fig. 7. Spectra of hydroxyapate specimens after three different
heating conditions.
Specimen (A) is SRM® 2910 after drying at 105 °C
for 24 h and then heated at 850 °C for 142 h. Specimen (B) has
been given the same treatment as Specimen (A) but with an additional
heating at 1000 °C for 24 h, which shows a new band, 434 cm-1,
indicating dehydroxylation. Specimen (C) has been given the same
treatment as Specimen (B) but with an additional subsequent heating
at 850 °C for 19 h; this shows disappearance of the 434 cm-1
band, indicative of rehydroxylation.
The relative humidity was about (30 to 50) % for all heating treatments.
Fig. 5 (from reference 34) shows the 434 cm-1 band as being
absent in "pure" HA vs. the situation in which there is
a presence of OHA.
REFERENCES
[1] Neter, J.; Wasserman, W.; Kutner, M.H.; Applied Linear Statistical
Models, 3rd Ed., Irwin, Boston (1990).
[2] Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISBN
92-67-10188-9, 1st Ed., ISO, Geneva, Switzerland (1993); see also
Taylor, B.N.; Kuyatt, C.E.; Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing
the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results; NIST Technical Note
1297, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC (1994).
[3] Markovic, M.; Fowler, B.O.; Tung, M.S.; Lagergren, E.S.; Composition
and Solubility Product of a Synthetic Calcium Hydroxyapatite. Chemical
and Thermal Determination of Ca/P Ratio and Statistical Analysis
of Chemical and Solubility Data; in: Mineral Scale Formation and
Inhibition, Proceedings of Am. Chem. Soc. Symposium, Ed. Amjad,
Z.; Plenum Press, NY, pp. 271-282 (1995).
[4] Taylor, B.N.; Guide for the Use of the International System
of Units (SI); NIST Special Publication 811; U.S. Government Printing
Office: Washington, DC (1995).
[5] McDowell, H.; Gregory, T.M.; Brown, W.E.; Solubility of Ca5(PO4)3OH
in the System Ca(OH)2 - H3PO4 - H2O at 5, 15, 25, and 37 °C;
J. Res. NBS, Vol. 81A, pp. 273-281 (1977).
[6] Markovic, M.; Fowler, B.O.; Tung, M.S.; Preparation and Comprehensive
Characterization of Calcium Hydroxyapatite Reference Material; J.
Res. NIST (2003) in press.
[7] Markovic, M.; Fowler, B.O.; Tung, M.S.; Preparation and Characterization
of Monoclinic Calcium Hydroxyapatite; (in preparation).
[8] Kay, M.I.; Young, R.A.; Posner, A.S.; Crystal Structure of
Hydroxyapatite; Nature, Vol. 204, pp. 1050-1052 (1964).
[10] Markovic, M.; Fowler, B.O.; Brown, W.E.; Octacalcium Phosphate
Carboxylates; 2 Characterization and Structural Considerations;
Chem. Mater., Vol. 5, pp. 1406-1416 (1993).
[11] Gee, A.; Deitz, V.R.; Determination of Phosphate by Differential
Spectrophotometry; Anal. Chem., Vol. 25, pp. 1320-1324 (1953).
[12] Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P.H.; Teller, E.; Adsorption of Gases
in Multimolecular Layers; J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 60, pp. 309-319
(1938).
[13] Gregory, T.M.; Moreno, E.C.; Brown, W.E.; Solubility of CaHPO4·2H2O
in the System Ca(OH)2 - H3P04 - H2O at 5, 15, 25, and 37.5 °C;
J. Res. NBS, Vol. 74A, pp. 461-475 (1970).
[14] Gee, A.; Deitz, V.R.; Pyrophosphate Formation upon Ignition
of Precipitated Basic Calcium Phosphates; J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol.
77, pp. 2961-2965 (1955).
[15] Klug, H.P.; Alexander, L.E.; X-ray Diffraction Procedures
for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials; 2nd Ed., Chapter 9:
Crystallite Size and Lattice Strains from Line Broadening; John
Wiley and Sons, NY, pp. 618-708 (1974).
[16] Fowler, B. O.; Infrared Studies of Apatites. II. Preparation
of Normal and Isotopically Substituted Calcium, Strontium, and Barium
Hydroxyapatites and Spectra-Structure-Composition Correlations;
Inorg. Chem., Vol. 13, pp. 207-214 (1974).
[17] Chung, F.H.; Quantitative Interpretation of X-ray Diffraction
Patterns. I Matrix-Flushing Method for Quatitative Multi-component
Analysis; J. Applied Cryst., Vol. 7, pp. 519-525 (1974).
[18] Chung, F.H.; Quantitative Interpretation of X-ray Diffraction
Patterns. II Adiabatic Principle of X-ray Diffraction Analysis of
Mixtures; J. Applied Cryst., Vol. 7, pp. 526-531 (1974).
[19] Eanes, E.D.; Gillessen, I. H.; Posner, A.S.; Intermediate
States in the Precipitation of Hydroxyapatite; Nature, Vol. 208,
pp. 364-367 (1965).
[20] Eanes, E.D.; Meyer, J.L.; The Maturation of Crystalline Calcium
Phosphates in Aqueous Suspensions at Physiologic pH; Calcif. Tiss.
Res., Vol. 23, pp. 259-269 (1977).
[21] Cline, J.P.; Schiller, S.B.; Liu, H-K.; Trahey, N.M.; Certificate,
SRM 676 Alumina Internal Standard for Quantitative Analysis by X-ray
Powder Diffraction; NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (1992).
[22] Cline, J.P.; NIST XRD Standard Reference Materials: Their
Characterization and Uses; Proceedings of the International Conference:
Accuracy in Powder Diffraction II; NIST Special Publication 846;
U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC (1992).
[23] Larson, A.C.; Von Dreele, R.B.; General Structure Analysis
System (GSAS); Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR, pp. 86-748
(1994).
[24] Thompson, P.; Cox, D.E.; Hastings, J.B.; Rietveld Refinement
of Debye-Scherrer Synchrotron X-ray Data from A12O3, J. Applied
Cryst., Vol. 20, pp. 79-83 (1987). SRM 2910 Page 8 of 9 SRM 2910
9
[25] Caglioti, G.; Paoletti, A.; Ricci, F.P.; Choice of Collimators
for a Crystal Spectrometer for Neutron Diffraction; Nuclear Instrumentation,
Vol. 3, pp. 223-228 (1958).
[26] Hubbard, C.R.; Zhang, Y.; McKenzie, R.L.; Certificate of Analysis,
SRM 660 Instrument Line Position and Profile Shape Standard for
X-ray Powder Diffraction; NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (1989).
[27] Von Dreele, R.B.; Cline, J.P.; The Impact of Background Function
on High Accuracy Quantitative Rietveld Analysis (QRA): Application
to NIST SRMs 676 and 656; Adv. X-ray Anal., Vol. 38, pp. 59-68 (1994).
[28] Trombe, J.C. and Montel, G. J. inorg. nucl.Chem. 40,15-21
(1978).
[29] Verbeeck, R.M.H., Heiligers, H.J.M., Driessens, F.C.M. and
Schaeken, H.G. Z. anorg. allg. Chem.,466, 76-80 (1980).
[30] Wang, Pauchiu E. and Chaki, T.K. J. Mater. Sci.:Mater. Med.
4, 150-158 (1993).
[31] Kijima, Tsuyoshi and Masayuki, Tsutsumi J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
62(9-10) 455-460 (1979).
[32] Cihlar, J., Buchal, A. and Trunec, M. J. Mater. Sci. 34, 6121-6131
(1999).
[33] Hartmann, P., Jager, C., Barth, St., Vogel, J. and Meyer,
K. J. Solid State Chem. 160, 460-468 (2001).
[34] Kuroda, S. and Fowler, B.O. Calcif. Tissue Int. 36, 361-369
(1984).
[35] Markovic, M., Fowler, B.O., Tung, M.S. and Lagergren, E.S.
In: Mineral Scale Formation and Inhibition, Plenum Press, New York,
1995, pp 271-282.
[36] Fowler, B.O., unpublished raw data (figure) results.